Crop rotation: An effective system to improve crop production efficiency and minimize C footprints
Crop rotation has long been recognized as a beneficial management practice that increases crop productivity, break disease and insect cycles, and reduces the seed bank of stubborn weeds. However, its ecological services and environment benefits have not been systematically measured and analyzed. In this presentation, I will use two case studies to demonstrate the dual benefits of crop rotation for crop productivity and environmental carbon (C) footprint in the Eastern Canadian Mixedwood Plains Ecozone. Case 1 is an on-going study testing a maize-dominated cereal and legume crop rotation since 1992. It consists of three cropping systems: maize-soybean (MS), maize-forage legume (MF), and continuous maize monoculture (MM). Maize plots were fertilized with varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure during the maize phase of crop rotation. Case 2 was a four-year, four-crop, canola-dominated phase rotation and conducted over two cycles (2011-2018) at three sites in eastern Canada. In each rotation type, both crops appeared each year. For example, MS and SM, soybeancanola (SC) and CS, etc. occurred simultaneously at each site each year to account for the annual environmental influence on crop rotation effects, thereby total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and C footprint could be estimated annually. The following main points can be drawn from these projects: 1. The continuous maize monoculture produced the lowest grain yield, while maize in rotation with forage-legume yielded the highest; 2. Repeated manure application could provide up to 100% of the N required for the maximum maize yield; 3. N replacement values (NRV) ranged from 40 to 120 kg ha-1 for maize-soybean, and from 130 to 180 kg ha-1 for maize-forage legume rotation systems; 4. The magnitude of C footprint reduction varied with N fertilizer application rates, and maize treated with 100 kg N ha-1 in MS rotation produced the greatest economic yield with relatively low GHG emissions and C footprint; 5. Diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint by 33%; and 6. Planting soybeans as a previous crop to canola is a promising strategy to increase canola crop productivity and N uptake, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of canola production. Our findings suggest that increased maize yields and reduced C footprints can be achieved through appropriate N application and crop rotation with forage legumes or soybeans, and that planting canola after soybeans or wheat following canola is a viable and sustainable strategy in eastern Canada.
知識樹分類
消費者知識庫 > 農藝類
消費者知識庫 > 園藝類
消費者知識庫 > 環境生態類
相關檔案下載
- 2024臺灣蔬菜產業發展暨前瞻科技研討會論文輯-綜合討論與活動花絮113/10/18
- 有益微生物加值技術應用於作物耐逆性之提升113/10/18
- 省工農機具研發於蔬菜產業之應用113/10/18
- 人工智慧於農業領域的應用113/10/18
- 精準育種在蔬菜產業之應用與潛力113/10/18
- 設施蔬菜研發成果與未來發展113/10/18
- 蔬菜採後處理研發成果及未來發展113/10/18
- 蔬菜育種研發成果及未來發展113/10/18
- 國際蔬菜種苗產業發展與未來展望113/10/18
- 國際蔬菜市場概況盤點與分享113/10/18