Crop rotation: An effective system to improve crop production efficiency and minimize C footprints
Crop rotation has long been recognized as a beneficial management practice that increases crop productivity, break disease and insect cycles, and reduces the seed bank of stubborn weeds. However, its ecological services and environment benefits have not been systematically measured and analyzed. In this presentation, I will use two case studies to demonstrate the dual benefits of crop rotation for crop productivity and environmental carbon (C) footprint in the Eastern Canadian Mixedwood Plains Ecozone. Case 1 is an on-going study testing a maize-dominated cereal and legume crop rotation since 1992. It consists of three cropping systems: maize-soybean (MS), maize-forage legume (MF), and continuous maize monoculture (MM). Maize plots were fertilized with varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure during the maize phase of crop rotation. Case 2 was a four-year, four-crop, canola-dominated phase rotation and conducted over two cycles (2011-2018) at three sites in eastern Canada. In each rotation type, both crops appeared each year. For example, MS and SM, soybeancanola (SC) and CS, etc. occurred simultaneously at each site each year to account for the annual environmental influence on crop rotation effects, thereby total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and C footprint could be estimated annually. The following main points can be drawn from these projects: 1. The continuous maize monoculture produced the lowest grain yield, while maize in rotation with forage-legume yielded the highest; 2. Repeated manure application could provide up to 100% of the N required for the maximum maize yield; 3. N replacement values (NRV) ranged from 40 to 120 kg ha-1 for maize-soybean, and from 130 to 180 kg ha-1 for maize-forage legume rotation systems; 4. The magnitude of C footprint reduction varied with N fertilizer application rates, and maize treated with 100 kg N ha-1 in MS rotation produced the greatest economic yield with relatively low GHG emissions and C footprint; 5. Diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint by 33%; and 6. Planting soybeans as a previous crop to canola is a promising strategy to increase canola crop productivity and N uptake, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of canola production. Our findings suggest that increased maize yields and reduced C footprints can be achieved through appropriate N application and crop rotation with forage legumes or soybeans, and that planting canola after soybeans or wheat following canola is a viable and sustainable strategy in eastern Canada.
知識樹分類
消費者知識庫 > 農藝類
消費者知識庫 > 園藝類
消費者知識庫 > 環境生態類
相關檔案下載
- 59-2-15-266-276 苜蓿與燕麥混植生產技術探討115/06/02
- 59-2-14-253-265 飼糧添加二階段混合羽毛粉-大豆粕發酵產品對肥育期豬隻屠體性狀及脂肪酸組成之影響 115/06/02
- 59-2-13-245-252 日糧中補充益生菌對泌乳羊於臺灣熱季乾物質採食量、泌乳量及乳成分之影響 115/06/02
- 59-2-12-235-244 以乳脂肪酸組成作為泌乳牛飼糧營養監控之探討 115/06/02
- 59-2-11-220-234-酵素處理於食用包裝原料性質及食品保鮮影響之綜論.pdf115/06/02
- 59-2-10-209-219 太陽麻及盤固草混植栽培模式之建立115/06/02
- 59-2-09-197-208-飼糧中不同粗蛋白質含量對荷蘭泌乳牛碳排放量之影響.pdf115/06/02
- 59-2-08-187-196-番鴨誘導多能性幹細胞株應用於水禽小病毒疫苗生產之研究.pdf115/06/02
- 59-2-07-174-186 自動電動化與傳統柴油TMR 餵飼系統對酪農場經營成本之影響 115/06/02
- 59-2-06-166-173-評估低粗蛋白飼糧於畜試雜交土雞之生長後期生長性能與溫室氣體排放.pdf115/06/02





