Crop rotation: An effective system to improve crop production efficiency and minimize C footprints
Crop rotation has long been recognized as a beneficial management practice that increases crop productivity, break disease and insect cycles, and reduces the seed bank of stubborn weeds. However, its ecological services and environment benefits have not been systematically measured and analyzed. In this presentation, I will use two case studies to demonstrate the dual benefits of crop rotation for crop productivity and environmental carbon (C) footprint in the Eastern Canadian Mixedwood Plains Ecozone. Case 1 is an on-going study testing a maize-dominated cereal and legume crop rotation since 1992. It consists of three cropping systems: maize-soybean (MS), maize-forage legume (MF), and continuous maize monoculture (MM). Maize plots were fertilized with varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure during the maize phase of crop rotation. Case 2 was a four-year, four-crop, canola-dominated phase rotation and conducted over two cycles (2011-2018) at three sites in eastern Canada. In each rotation type, both crops appeared each year. For example, MS and SM, soybeancanola (SC) and CS, etc. occurred simultaneously at each site each year to account for the annual environmental influence on crop rotation effects, thereby total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and C footprint could be estimated annually. The following main points can be drawn from these projects: 1. The continuous maize monoculture produced the lowest grain yield, while maize in rotation with forage-legume yielded the highest; 2. Repeated manure application could provide up to 100% of the N required for the maximum maize yield; 3. N replacement values (NRV) ranged from 40 to 120 kg ha-1 for maize-soybean, and from 130 to 180 kg ha-1 for maize-forage legume rotation systems; 4. The magnitude of C footprint reduction varied with N fertilizer application rates, and maize treated with 100 kg N ha-1 in MS rotation produced the greatest economic yield with relatively low GHG emissions and C footprint; 5. Diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint by 33%; and 6. Planting soybeans as a previous crop to canola is a promising strategy to increase canola crop productivity and N uptake, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of canola production. Our findings suggest that increased maize yields and reduced C footprints can be achieved through appropriate N application and crop rotation with forage legumes or soybeans, and that planting canola after soybeans or wheat following canola is a viable and sustainable strategy in eastern Canada.
知識樹分類
消費者知識庫 > 農藝類
消費者知識庫 > 園藝類
消費者知識庫 > 環境生態類
相關檔案下載
- 59-1-全冊.pdf115/03/16
- 10-微衛星標記應用於褐色菜鴨復養族群配種制度建立.pdf115/03/16
- 09-畜試土雞高畜9號品系於涼、熱季環境之生理參數、血液生化值及血液學調查.pdf115/03/16
- 08-經產與初產阿爾拜因山羊陰道黏液導電度、酸鹼度及陰道溫度變化.pdf115/03/16
- 07-高溫濕度指數下補充維生素E硒與β-胡蘿蔔素對亞臨床性乳房炎荷蘭泌乳牛之泌乳性能與血液性狀之影響.pdf115/03/16
- 04-純種母豬產仔收候選標記NR4A1、 EXOC4、FSHβ之評估.pdf115/03/16
- 03-探討環境溫度對白肉雞生理值、血液生化及血液學之影響.pdf115/03/16
- 02-不同堆肥化日數之雞糞可見近紅外光光譜特徵與腐熟度相關性評估.pdf115/03/16
- 01-調查涼、熱季環境條件下飼養蘭嶼豬之直腸溫度、呼吸速率及血液生理生化值變化.pdf115/03/16
- 畜產專訊第135期(全).pdf115/03/11





