Crop rotation: An effective system to improve crop production efficiency and minimize C footprints
Crop rotation has long been recognized as a beneficial management practice that increases crop productivity, break disease and insect cycles, and reduces the seed bank of stubborn weeds. However, its ecological services and environment benefits have not been systematically measured and analyzed. In this presentation, I will use two case studies to demonstrate the dual benefits of crop rotation for crop productivity and environmental carbon (C) footprint in the Eastern Canadian Mixedwood Plains Ecozone. Case 1 is an on-going study testing a maize-dominated cereal and legume crop rotation since 1992. It consists of three cropping systems: maize-soybean (MS), maize-forage legume (MF), and continuous maize monoculture (MM). Maize plots were fertilized with varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure during the maize phase of crop rotation. Case 2 was a four-year, four-crop, canola-dominated phase rotation and conducted over two cycles (2011-2018) at three sites in eastern Canada. In each rotation type, both crops appeared each year. For example, MS and SM, soybeancanola (SC) and CS, etc. occurred simultaneously at each site each year to account for the annual environmental influence on crop rotation effects, thereby total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and C footprint could be estimated annually. The following main points can be drawn from these projects: 1. The continuous maize monoculture produced the lowest grain yield, while maize in rotation with forage-legume yielded the highest; 2. Repeated manure application could provide up to 100% of the N required for the maximum maize yield; 3. N replacement values (NRV) ranged from 40 to 120 kg ha-1 for maize-soybean, and from 130 to 180 kg ha-1 for maize-forage legume rotation systems; 4. The magnitude of C footprint reduction varied with N fertilizer application rates, and maize treated with 100 kg N ha-1 in MS rotation produced the greatest economic yield with relatively low GHG emissions and C footprint; 5. Diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint by 33%; and 6. Planting soybeans as a previous crop to canola is a promising strategy to increase canola crop productivity and N uptake, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of canola production. Our findings suggest that increased maize yields and reduced C footprints can be achieved through appropriate N application and crop rotation with forage legumes or soybeans, and that planting canola after soybeans or wheat following canola is a viable and sustainable strategy in eastern Canada.
知識樹分類
消費者知識庫 > 農藝類
消費者知識庫 > 園藝類
消費者知識庫 > 環境生態類
相關檔案下載
- 葡萄銹病夏孢子發芽之影響因子與殺菌劑抑制效果評估115/07/27
- 整合深度學習與多目標追蹤技術於百香果自動化篩選系統之研製115/07/27
- 乾溼交替灌溉處理對水稻台農71號與台南11號生長特性與產量之影響115/07/27
- 建立適用於臺灣亞熱帶氣候區之青花菜修正積溫預測模型115/07/27
- 農業人員淨零排放認知與行為意向之研究115/07/27
- 高接梨施用不同濃度硼對新梢生長之影響115/07/27
- 農業部臺中區農業改良場研究彙報(第169期)115/07/27
- 荖葉細菌性角斑病之發生與防治策略115/07/22
- 荔枝果園導入噴灌管路灌溉 穩定結果助農民好收成115/07/22
- 2026 台灣國際農業機械暨資材展 臺中農改場智慧省工農機成果亮相115/07/22





